A wheels question for the dealers/techies/people who know

Just arrived in comments, from Filip in Poland:

Need advice on wheels for 9-3SS V6 XWD, plse. I’ve recently bought one with sports suspension, 18″ wheels and larger brakes. The wheels are basically the same as in Turbo X. The idiots at local Saab dealer (Warsaw, Poland) said any 17″ Saab wheels would be ok as winter wheels. To my (and their) astonishment – standard 17″ wheels were too small for larger front brakes. Does anyone know which 17″ wheels (if any) can be used in this model?

I have a feeling that you’re going to need to get 18s if you’ve got the bigger brakes, but I know little about these things.

So it’s over to the techie people……

——

Having a look at nearest English-language car configurator to yours, with that model the smallest wheels you can order are the 18s. And with the 345mm performance brake kit, I’d tend to think 18s are the smallest for exactly the reason you’re now facing – your brakes are huge!

Despite your wheel issues, Filip, enjoy the Aero!!!!

2009 Saab 9-3 SportCombi Named “Top 5 Wagon”

The following is a press release from SaabUSA and it officially contains some good news.

Woohoo!!

——

DETROIT – The editors at NADAguides.com, a leading vehicle pricing and information website based in Costa Mesa, California, have named the Saab 9-3 Aero SportCombi a “Top 5 Wagon”. An important contributor to the award was the availability of Saab’s “Cross-Wheel Drive” (XWD) system, new for the 2009 model year as standard equipment in the 9-3 Aero SportSedan and SportCombi and available on 2.0T models.

“When they say engineered from jets, they mean it,” said Don Christy, president and CEO of NADAguides.com. “The 2009 Saab 9-3 Aero SportCombi is a great looking wagon with a laundry list of standard equipment. In this category, this is something special.”

Developed in Sweden with Haldex of Stockholm, Saab’s “Cross-Wheel Drive” is a pre-emptive, active-on-demand system that is activated only when required, limiting the impact on fuel economy while giving the car a surefooted, dynamic feel that enthusiasts embrace. Saab’s Cross-Wheel Drive system is designed to optimize vehicle handling and stability in all driving conditions.

“True to its Scandinavian origins, Saab has built a large part of its reputation on excellent road manners under demanding driving conditions like rain, sleet and snow,” said Steve Shannon, executive director product and brand at Saab Automobile USA. “Our new Cross-Wheel Drive technology, which delivers unprecedented levels of driver involvement and dynamic chassis control, further illustrates Saab’s commitment to offering active safety in sporty, efficient and driver-focused vehicles.”

Saab Cross-Wheel Drive is a fully automatic, on-demand system capable of sending up to 100 percent of engine torque to the front or rear wheels whenever necessary. While offering drivers sure-footed handling in low-grip conditions, its sophisticated operation also adds a further sporty dimension to the driving experience in all road conditions.

This state-of-the-art, all-wheel drive system includes two innovative features: pre-emptive engagement of the rear wheels to optimize traction at take-off; and an electronically controlled rear limited-slip differential (eLSD) that allows variable torque transfer between the rear wheels. While the eLSD is standard on Aero models; it is not available on the 9-3 2.0T.

——

For those of you who, like me, haven’t herd of NADAguides.com, they provide a web based vehicle comparison service and have done so online since 2000. They also sell little blue and yellow books (good colors) with this info.

The NADA in NADAguides stands for “National Automobile Dealers Association” and is, indeed, a big deal.

So…..pop corks and celebrate a scarce win!

Tuesday night snippets

Reuters have a couple of reports on the current Swedish saga…

Report 1 – The good news:

Chinese car maker Chery Automobile Co has no plan to buy U.S. auto assets, its chairman was quoted as saying by state media on Tuesday.

Chery, which secured a 10 billion yuan ($1.45 billion) bank loan from the China Import-Export Bank this week, will use the money to improve its product quality rather than buying auto assets in the United States, Yin Tongyao told the Shanghai Securities News on the sidelines of a company event.

When they say “US assets”, they’re including Saab and Volvo.

I have a deep and abiding fear of Saab being bought out by a Chinese company, so it’s good news to me if we can strike one off the list.

There’s lots more where they came from, however, as Vovlo are finding out at the moment.

Report 2:

Ford Motor is in talks to sell its Volvo car business to its China partner Changan Automobile Group, the National Business Daily reported on Tuesday, citing an unnamed source at the Chinese company.

Changan president Xu Liuping held discussions with Ford and Volvo during last month’s auto show in the Chinese city of Guangzhou, the newspaper said.

The report did not provide details of the talks, but quoted an unidentified Changan executive as saying there was a chance for a deal. Changan is one of China’s six biggest auto groups.

——

The road seems so clear now that Kroymans have dropped their European importation of Cadillac, Corvette and Hummer.

1. GM Europe take a decision to stand up to the guys in Detroit and say Cadillac in Europe is a waste of money, especially in this economic climate.

2. The newly appointed Car Czar agrees.

3. The Swedish government provide their loan guarantees for Saab’s continued production planning.

4. Work commences post-haste on a replacement for the Saab 9-3. The new, smaller Saab that the company really needs.

5. We all sit in the sun by the river in Trollhattan and watch the passers-by, pass by.

What is so hard about any of this?

——

Note spotted by the punch-in clock at Saab in Trollhattan (truly):

Dear collegues,

Due to the current financial situation and the general aim of cutting cost and saving energy, the light at the end of the tunnel has been switched off until further notice.

Regards,

Upper management

An oldie but a goodie.

——

Trollhattan Saab is now on Twitter.

I have very little idea as to what I’m actually doing with it, but I think it’ll automatically generate a ‘tweet’ when a new post goes up. I’ll probably preview some posts, too, with some witty one-liners.

If you prefer to tweet than to RSS, then it might be for you.

And please don’t get mad if I don’t follow you on Twitter. My tweeting time will be limited. It’s always best to get me via email.

——

Here’s a bloody good article on Saab from Auto Savant.

The article is all about relating the gaping hole in Saab’s range right now to the hole that was left after they stopped making the Saab 96. I was a little angry when I first read it, thinking that they were talking down the Saab 99 (which is still my favourite Saab model, btw).

I got over it.

It’s a good thinker of an article and congratulations to them for coming up with it. Makes that case for the new 9-3 all that much more relevant.

——

Remember Lance Cole’s article on the Saab 91 Safir?

Olav in Norway – who always takes the long road home – has sent through some screenshots of his Saab 91 Safir. He picked it up on Microsoft’s Flight Simulator.

Compare these to the photos in Lance’s article. Aside from the color scheme it’s a dead ringer!

Kroymans dump Cadillac in Europe

I should feel satisfied and vindicated by news like this, but it’s hard to do so when it means the livelihoods of a large number of people are placed in danger.

Albert VDB has sent through some news from Holland about Kroymans, the big Dutch importer who are the importer for Cadillac in Europe. Cadillac have been dumped.

Staff at the Cadillac & Corvette Experience Center in Breukelen were told of the initial plans late last week and word leaked to the Dutch newspaper, Telegraaf. This has now been confirmed.

The news translation from the original Dutch almost reads like a carbon copy of Rick Wagoner’s answers before Congress last week:

We’re preparing for the future and the recession of course also plays an important role. We have obviously made mistakes but which are in progress, now that happens once. We now go through the pain to go there more to come . This implies that the less well-performing enterprises are divested and profitable businesses that we will give extra attention.

So Kroymans are dropping Cadillac.

That means it’s most likely up to GM Europe to carry the can for the brand there, if they’re game enough to do so.

Maybe this whole worldwide recession thing, combined with the “nobody’s been buying Cadillacs in Europe anyway” thing, will be enough to convince GM Europe that it needs to invest in one of its native European brands that’s already in place, accepted, and in dire need of a fresh, rightsized model mix.

A move like that should be made from a position of strength, not as an act of desparation.

Cadillac didn’t have the vehicles in place to make a European move. It was the sheer force of Detroit’s will that saw them there, with a goal of selling 20,000 vehicles annually by 2010. That goal saw millions and millions of Euros invested with only around 25% of that goal fulfilled, if that.

I hope GM Europe take a good hard look at the business case for Cadillac in Europe and realise that right now, it’s a total waste of resources that could be better spent elsewhere. Continuing the debacle would be a textbook case of throwing good money after bad, which they can ill afford to do right now.

Plow that money into a new Saab 9-3 by 2012 and watch them profit.

Condolences to the people who at Kroymans who are going to be affected by this. It’s not only Caddy, Corvette and Hummer that are facing the axe. Kroymans also imports Saab and Alfa Romeo.

——

Thanks Albert!!

Preliminary GM bailout legislation released

The US Congress has drafted the bill proposed to give the Detroit car companies a lifeline, at least until the Obama administration takes office on January 20. The bill is apparently now with the White House where, hopefully, there won’t be too much more to-ing and fro-ing before the money can start flowing.

CNN Money have the low-down on the basics:

Under the proposal being reviewed by the White House, the president would appoint an individual to write the guidelines for the loan, due by Jan. 1, and oversee the bailout. This person – a so-called “car czar” – would essentially be in charge of setting the terms for restructuring the Big Three automakers.

The official would have authority to negotiate with unions, debt holders, suppliers and other “interested parties” to help work out restructuring plans.

The plan would also give the Government Accountability Office a special role in overseeing the program.

Under the proposal, the government would receive warrants – the right to buy a stake in the companies at a certain price – equal to 20% of the loan’s value. That means taxpayers would take a significant share of GM, which has asked for $10 billion in loans.

The companies would also have to drop their lawsuits against individual states that have passed laws on emissions standards that are more extensive than the federal government’s.

More from the Detroit News:

The government would have the right to veto transactions over $25 million and would report to Congress on the companies’ progress every 15 days.

Automakers would be barred from having corporate aircraft, couldn’t pay bonuses to top executives and wouldn’t be able to pay dividends to shareholders.

Estimates say that the $10 billion GM are seeking should see them through to March next year. On March 31, the companies will have to file detailed plans as to how they will turn their businesses around.

I guess that means Saab are going to have to have something firmly in place well before then, and then they have to hope that that Car Czar doesn’t mandate the elimination of a small, as-yet unprofitable foreign brand (if it’s in their power to do so).

Inmates at the doors

Again, I must be brief today as the real world job has me booked solid.

Just a couple of notes of concern about some recent bailout news. Both of these stories are from Automotive News.

First, the UAW wants a seat on GM’s board in return for additional concessions:

In a posting on the UAW Local 2404 website, local president Marc McQuillen said union leadership had said rank-and-file workers would have to ratify new concessionary contract provisions for GM by March 31.

The UAW will also offer another round of buyouts in 2009 if government bailout funds are provided to GM and allowed to be used for that purpose, McQuillen said.

“In return for these actions, the UAW seeks an equity stake in the company most likely in the form of a board seat,” McQuillen said.

My initial thought was “holy schmozzoli! The inmates will be running the asylum” but then……if they’re smart enough to get the conditions they’ve been working under for the last XX years then maybe they’re smarter than their bosses after all.

Uhhhhh, no. On second thoughts, I don’t think their tactics would work at executive level. Can you imagine them mad at the US car buying public for not buying their cars? Would their response be to go on strike and stop making them?

——

This second article is about the bailout conditions being considered by Washington:

The government overseer who would be in charge of emergency aid for the Detroit 3 should have the power to force an automaker into bankruptcy if the company fails to restructure for long-term viability, the White House said today.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino outlined Bush administration criteria in negotiating emergency-aid legislation with Democratic leaders of Congress. At a briefing, she called a deal “very likely” sometime today, even though the White House hasn’t received draft legislative language from Congress.

Imagine working with that guy over your shoulder?

——

I may be a panic-merchant sometimes, but when I hear stories like this it really makes me shudder.

With just GM at the helm of GM, Saab have a small chance of being understood and the potential for them to grow to be seen. With guys like either of these within earshot of the helm of GM, I really am left to wonder.

Eurosnippets – the non-sale of Saab and government guarantees

It’s Monday in the northern hemisphere and that means the news wires are ticking away once again.

Here’s the latest, sent in from various people – thanks!!

——

Reuters
are reporting that the Swedish government is now set to offer finance guarantees to both Saab and Volvo:

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) – The Swedish government is expected to offer loans and loan guarantees worth several billion Swedish crowns to struggling U.S.-owned car makers Volvo Cars and Saab Automobile, daily Dagens Industri reported on Monday, citing an unidentified source…..

…..”It is not a question of subsidies or of the government going in as an owner, but of loans and loan guarantees on good terms,” the source said in the report.

The report also talks of a Swedish super-research center that would bring some old friends and foes together:

The report also said the government is in talks with the two car firms and truck makers Volvo and Scania about establishing a jointly owned company to promote environmentally friendly research and development.

I get a little hairy when I read about this funding for research. That’s all well and good for 5 or 6 years from now, but I get the feeling that Saab’s concerns are more immediate than that.

The good news – it looks like they’ll get the guarantees, and that means a greater potential for viability, whether under GM or someone else.

——

Automotive News Europe (subs) provide some analysis of both Saab and Volvo’s prospects of finding a buyer, if that’s what it all comes down to.

As Ford Motor and General Motors consider selling their Swedish brands, Volvo’s long-term future seems brighter than Saab’s.

Here’s why:

– Volvo has a newer, more diverse model lineup and is three times larger than Saab

– Volvo has more R&D capabilities to produce its own cars

– Saab has rarely been profitable since GM bought it while Volvo has made a lot of money for Ford

– Volvo’s parent company is in a better position than Saab’s.

But to counter that, I’d like offer the following:

–> Saab have an incredible capacity to ppunch above their weight. Their R&D ability is right up there with the best of them. It’s just the R&D resources that have always been scarce. Saab can pay someone back in spades.

–> The word from someone whose worked for both companies is that Saab is a much more fluid organisation. Decisions at Volvo take a long, long time.

–> Saab has done all the work to become lean, effecient, and more focused on quality. Volvo’s journey down that road only began this year.

–> Saab will represent a much smaller up-front investment, with a leaner organisation all ready to go.

That’s just how I see it.

They conclude differently, of course:

The position of Saab is more precarious than that of Volvo. It also has less time to find a savior because its parent GM is in a worse financial position than Ford.

Holmqvist thinks the solution for Saab lies with what happens to fellow GM subsidiary Opel, which has asked for help from the German government.

Said Holmqvist: “I don’t think Saab is sellable as it is, because there is only really production in Sweden, and they are in serious trouble.”

——

In US news, there are more calls for Rick Wagoner to leave his post at GM, and this year’s Nobel Prize for Economics winner thinks this whole bailout thing is just prolonging the inevitable.

Bones

My apologies for the indulgent nature of this post, but sometimes you can’t get to write the things you should until you’ve cleared away all the stuff that’s clogging you up.

——

The gut

I have a pretty good gut. I have a very large gut because I feed it too much, but that’s a whole other story, and thankfully its largesse hasn’t decreased my capacity to feel.

At age 16, my gut told me it wasn’t OK to try and drink my father’s death away one night. So I didn’t. I’ve barely touched a drop since and I’m ever so grateful for it.

At age 18, my gut told me it would be bad news to go out with that girl. But who listens to their gut in that situation? I should have.

At around age 21, despite a purely Australian automotive upbringing, my gut told me that the Saab 9000 I was riding in was absolutely brilliant and would probably change my life. It has.

At age 24, and with no job or higher education, my gut told me everything would be alright. And it is.

At age 34 and 11 months, my gut told me that this new-fangled blogging thing might be worth a try, and seeing cars (and Saabs in particular) were the only things I felt passionate about, that’s what I’d write about.

The head

Like everyone else, I can feel right and wrong in my gut sometimes. And yet somehow, I don’t tend to act on it anywhere near as often as I should.

Some of that is down to timidity. I’m a fairly cautious person by nature. But it’s more than just timidity. It’s where my head comes in to the picture. Whilst my gut’s all emotion, my head is infatuated with a desire to reason. I am more often than not the devil’s advocate, no matter how lame the plight of the weakened argument I try to support.

At age 28, my head told me to marry my first wife, despite any misgivings I might have about us at the time.

After a national IQ test was held on television, my head told me to go and sit the IQ test being held locally shortly thereafter, sponsored by Mensa. My gut told me not to join, though.*

My head’s told me for the last four years that things will work out with Saab, that the next killer model is just around the corner.

My head tells me that I should continue negotiations with the media company that’s interested in buying Trollhattan Saab because I’ve worked bloody hard on it for four and a half years and something concrete should come out of that.

But then come the bones.

The bones

The bones are like the gut, but much, much stronger. When you feel something in your bones, it’s like you can smell it in a high wind. It’s the fear of loss. The thrill of imminent pleasure. The joy of a promosing road and knowing there’s not a soul around.

At age 30, my bones told me I’d never really loved my first wife. We divorced and it was 100% the right thing to do. At age 31 my bones told me I’d met the perfect woman for me. We married two years later.

At the same age my bones told me I was making a mistake selling my 99 Turbo. I bought it back three years later.

Your head can reason with your gut, but the bones are undeniable. I’ll probably buy that 99 Turbo a third time before things are all done and finished (if Bill will sell it).

——

At age 38, my head is arguing that Saab are on a knife’s edge. My head tells me that the most promising way forward for Saab is with as little interruption and instability as possible, as if they’re doing a finely balanced juggling act and the slightest interruption could send it all tumbling. My head keeps telling me that the best way forward is for GM to still own Saab in few years from now, because that’s the most promising way for a continued existence.

But my gut tells me that Saab would be much better off without GM. My gut tells me that Saab are always going to be like a neglected child in GM’s house, eating scraps from the table and wearing hand-me-downs from older, more important siblings.

My gut tells me that if Saab were given one unrestrained chance at hitting a home run, they’d slug it into the next suburb.

My gut tells me that Saab will survive this somehow, in some form.

My bones don’t tell me anything other than the fact that this journey, this blog, is tied to Saab’s own journey, in as much as that journey still holds some promise of Saab being the company that I think they can be. The negotiations to sell this site are off becuase I can’t, in good faith, tie myself contractually to a brand when there’s a chance I may not believe in that brand any more.

Saab will survive. It’s just a matter of how, and how well.

——

For what it’s worth, I think GM is too full of ‘head’ guys and too devoid of ‘gut’ guys. I think Bob Sinclair was a great businessman, and a ‘gut’ guy at heart. I think Bjorn Envall was totally a ‘gut’ guy, and most designers are. Their problem is that the ‘head’ guys are the ones with all the power. You can’t work gut into a ROI formula.

——

And a final thought….

My head tells me that a replacement flagship vehicle in the Saab 9-5 is incredibly important for Saab, but my bones tell me that a smaller Saab 9-3 like the one they’ve talked about is the vehicle that Saab need more than any other.

——

* Yes, I sat the Mensa exam and yes, I passed and was told I was in the top percentile of people who had taken the exam. This should tell you little about me, though, and more about the nature of perceived intelligence. If you want to know something about my own intelligence, witness the frequent mistakes here on this site. I’m just as dumb as the next guy.