GM invests in experimental waste-to-ethanol process

According to Chris Vander Doelen of Canada.com, General Motors has purchased a small stake in a company that has pioneered a novel approach to producing ethanol for fuel.

Update: Wow, this has been covered by a whole slew of media outlets! See here. I guess Canada.com was the only one that made my news feed for some reason.

Coskata, a Warrenville, Illinois-based company, has patented a process that uses two very simple concepts to convert many forms of waste (wood, tires, paper, food waste, bagasse and other agricultural byproducts, etc.) into alcohol suitable for fuels. The company claims that the process produces very little solid waste and consumes very little energy to produce a viable ethanol product.

I’ve studied the website, and I must say that if this process can be scaled up to a size suitable for mass production of ethanol, I may change my stance on E85. Current ethanol plants are energy hogs themselves, requiring huge amounts of carbon-based fuel consumption to distill ethanol that can be burned in an internal combustion engine. They are also moisture hogs, requiring a very large amount of water. Finally, the current technologies are feed-stock dependent, meaning that a plant built for biomass and agricultural wastes can’t produce ethanol from a different feed stock without significant modifications. The Coskata process seems to reduce those negatives.

The Coskata process is relatively simple: gasify all incoming feedstock using efficient high-temperature gas plasma ‘gasifiers’, use existing scubber technology to remove unwanted gases from the process, feed the raw ‘syngas’ (synthesized gas) into a reactor filled with a population of proprietary microorganisms that ferment the hydrocarbons into ethanol, condense and separate the resulting ethanol/water mixture and thus, you have a production stream of ethanol. Byproducts include high-energy syngas that can be used as a natural gas substitute to satisfy the energy needs of the production facility and high-temperature water which is fed back into the process for energy efficiency. A small amount of solid waste is produced when using “dirty” feedstocks like coal and tires.

Coskata process

What I especially like about this process is that all of the technology has been in use in various applications for years. Hydrocarbon gasification for easy use of solid fuels was developed 50 years ago or more. Syngas is a primary product of the huge oil sands operation in Northern Alberta, Canada and has been in production in the lignite fields of North Dakota, United States for some 20 years. And every alcohol production process separates water from alcohol to concentrate the final product. Thus, the properties are well known and should be reliable enough.

Obviously, the development hinges on the “proprietary micro organisms” that ferment the syngas into ethanol.

Per the Coskata website:

Coskata microorganisms are extremely efficient, utilizing the entire energy value of available input material to produce ethanol. This is a significant advantage over other approaches that only use a fraction of this energy due to their inability to utilize all portions of biomass input material and/or result in non-ethanol byproducts hurting efficiencies.

Coskata states, rightly so, that the current state-of-the-art ethanol refining technologies require the use of chemical catalysts that are only efficient with consistent (single-source), clean plant feedstock and under artificial conditions (very high hydrogen levels and high temperatures). This is the portion of the current technology that I have problems with: high energy consumption, lack of flexibility and intensive capital investment.

As I’ve said before: I think that GM is pretty serious about this ethanol thing. They are certainly putting their money where their mouth is.

I hope that this process leads to better, less costly, more acceptable ethanol production. It’s just one more option to make things more renewable.

It should also put the Saab BioPower in the forefront of GM’s marketing campaigns of the future. A great side benefit of being a part of the General.

Hungarian Winter outing – with E85 Saab 900!

A Hungarian Saab Club meeting can certainly draw a crowd – even in the middle of winter!

Ivan’s posted a number of photos from their recent event, where they all had a chance to get up close and personal with the 2008 Saab 9-3 in Snow Silver and running on E85, though that wasn’t the only car there on the green fuel…

Hungarian Saabs

Hungarian Saabs

Ivan’s friend Ákos owns the Saab 900 convertible that had the Xenon headlights installed recently. It’s a very, very sweet looking machine with its twin exhausts, chromed rims and LEDs as well. Not only is it looking magnificent, but Ivan tells me that he’s currently running it on E85.

Hungarian Saabs

It’s the first I’ve heard of it, but apparently there’s an additive that can be used to make the fuel less troublesome on older cars. Ákos’s experience has been trouble-free so far.

Ákos is the editor of one of the popular car magazines in Hungary, TotalCar, so I’m sure a writeup of his E85 experience will be forthcoming in the future.

Gripen tries out E85 in real-world conditions

Some of you may remember that TS contributor, 1985Gripen, was recently involved in a car accident. Thankfully he was OK with just some whiplash to contend with, but the accident left his work-supplied vehicle a write-off.

His replacement vehicle is a Chevy Impala LS, and it’s E85 capable. As an E85 supplier has recently opened in LA, Gripen – ever the environmentalist – couldn’t resist giving the biojuice a try.

The results were very interesting, and given that BioPower could well be better tuned by the time it hits US shores next year, it’ll be interesting to see what others get on the BioPower system when it arrives.

Here’s his writeup on the experience:

——

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.fueleconomy.gov) this car supposedly gets 16 mpg on E85 combined and 22 mpg on gasoline combined (28% better). However the test the EPA runs is really flawed when compared to the “real world”. They don’t take hills into consideration, for example.

I ran my car in every imaginable situation, from hills to high-speed highway driving, to stop-and-go freeway traffic, to idling for an hour in traffic at the border. Sometimes I had the air conditioner on. This was probably a perfect example of “mixed” driving.

When I first filled the tank with E85 there was still 3.246 gallons of E10 gasohol in the tank. The tank’s capacity is 17 gallons. I tried to get as close to empty as I could, but it’s hard to judge how to have enough gas in the car so you’re not stranded on the side of the road but still get as empty as you can.

Considering it’s winter here I’m guessing the E85 was closer to E70, meaning my tank of E85 was really about 20% E10 and 80% E70. I’m no mathematician, so what’s that come out to? Like E75?

Anyway, on that mix and some SERIOUSLY “mixed” driving I got 19.7 mpg.

I came pretty close to running out of gasohol the next time I filled- up, with only 0.587 gallons left in the tank. But I was able to calculate the fuel economy running on gasohol (E10): 20.2 mpg.

So surprisingly running on E75 (or whatever) didn’t have nearly the 30% mileage “hit” than is predicted. In fact, I only got around 3% worse fuel economy running on E85 than on regular unleaded.

Perhaps some of this is due to the fact that California’s regular unleaded gasoline already contains up to 10% ethanol by volume, I had about 20% E10 in the tank when I filled-up with E85 (or E70), the E85 probably contained double the gasoline percentage due to the “winter blend” (30% instead of 15%), and slightly differing driving conditions (I didn’t drive the exact same course).

I still would have expected my fuel economy on E85 to be at least 20% worse than gasohol under these conditions. Saab’s BioPower fuel economy difference between E85 and unleaded gasoline is supposed to be even less due to the optimization of the ECU.

Ethanol conversion coming for Sweden?

ctm sent me through this story just prior to Christmas. He translated it from Swedish publication Ny Teknik. A couple of interesting things come from it.

First is the fact that the US Ambassador to Sweden drives a Saab 9-5 BioPower when he’s not in the official US Caddy. Maybe he’d like to appear in BioPower advertising for SaabUSA when they go on sale in the US :-)

Second, it sounds like E85 conversion kits may become legal in Sweden. They’ve not been legal up until now due to warranty issues, but that may be changing so that the maker of the kits assumes some of the warranty risks.

It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out in 2008.

——

The environmentally conscious US ambassador to Sweden, Michael Wood, is tired of having to travel around in his fuel-thirsty embassy Cadillac. He wants to convert it for use with ethanol.

- “We have found a company that can do it, but the problem is the Swedish regulations not allowing us to do it. Now we have to ask for dispensation from the Swedish Road Administration and the government,” he says.

Privately, Michael Wood drives a Saab 9-5 BioPower. And he grabs every occasion to praise that car.

- “Everyone can switch to a car with an ethanol engine,” he said at a conference on green energy in Karlskoga, Sweden, earlier this year. On that occasion, however, he travelled the 150 miles from Stockholm in a two years old Cadillac De Ville with a 4.6 liter V8-engine, a car that manage about 12 miles per gallon.

When asked why the embassy Cadillac didn’t run on ethanol, the answer was that it would be too expensive to convert the security-equipped car. It would also be close to impossible to cut through the American bureaucracy with a request like that.

- “You can’t imagine the differences in the decision-making process between the private sector where I came from and the government machine where I currently work,” said Michael Wood at the time.

Well, that was then. Now he has not only found a company that can do it – and also doing it at a reasonable price (about USD 3.000) – he has also managed to get through the American bureaucracy and got an OK to convert the bulletproof limousine. The problem now is the Swedish laws and regulations.

It is not legal to just convert a petrol car to an ethanol car. The Swedish law says no because the carmakers legal responsibility for the car would be compromised. The Swedish Road Administration has investigated the matter, and proposed back in October 2005 that it should be legal to convert engines to ethanol. By approved converting kits, the legal responsibility for the cars exhaust emission control could be transfered to the companies that make the kits. But nothing ever happened to the proposal when it reached the government, and that is what stopped Michael Wood’s ambition to convert his limousine. Therefore, the American embassy wrote to Ministry of Foreign Affairs to have an exception for the embassy Cadillac.

Since it’s Christmas time there should be some good news here – and there is. The new government since last year has looked into the matter and the Ministry of Environment has the ambition to go through with the proposal from two years ago. After a legal process, they hope the decision can be taken next year and that the new regulations can be in place July 1, 2008.

And Michael Wood can then have a (more) environmentally friendly Cadillac De Ville.

——

And maybe others can have an E85 kit retrofitted to their car.

Thanks ctm!

BioPower vs Gasoline real world mileage test

Here’s something some might be interested in.

It’s always difficult to get definite figures on BioPower mileage as there are factors involved like the mix of fuel etc. So what we end up with is the 30% rule of thumb (i.e. 30% reduced fuel economy).

Vector220 drives a lot of rentals for his work (and he’s provided some comparos for us in the past on them, too), so with this in mind he decided to try comparing a 2008 Saab 9-3 BioPower with a regular gasoline-powered Saab 9-3 from 2007 in order to gauge the fuel consumption difference between the two.

He had the same trip to do one week after another, so he hired the cars and drove the exact same route in them – a 385km round trip. His brief notes are as follows:

The 2008 Saab 9-3 BioPower

Nice ride, a bit flat in the seat compared with my 220hp Vector, but no problem to drive 2 hours one way (190 km). The car felt like it needed more revs to get going and was a bit week on low revs… But hey, there was only 180 bhp….

The lighting was the best I’ve ever seen. And this with a non xenon car! The 08 9-3 provides very good visibility both to the left and right of the road (and of course ON the road).

The 2007 Saab 9-3 (gasoline)

I did the exact same trip. Same interior, same comfort, but not the same power. I needed to use the gear shift more to just keep up the flow and to overtake. Also the lights provided same lighting ON the road, But on the sides my visibility was not as good as the 08 model 9-3. The lighting was about par with my 2004 9-5.

——

So – the consumption figures…..

On a trip of 385 km the 08 car consumed 8.9 litres / 100 km
On a trip of 385 km the 07 car consumed 7.8 litres / 100 km

When calculating this using the price of both the fuels here in Sweden the E85 was 48 SEK cheaper to drive those 385 km. And it’s more fun in the E85 car. A good result, I think.

Note: Here in Sweden the E85 becomes E75 during the winters because the “E” cars are more reluctant to start when it is really cold. So we may have some more testing to do during a summer to see the real difference in fuel consumption.

——

And if you’re wondering why the lighting was of particular importance to Vector220, he had a deer jump up on his car at 100 km/h on a recent drive. That was in a Volvo S40 rental and he’s OK, though the car wasn’t and it was replaced by an Audi.

His words: boy am I glad I didn’t hit a moose!

——

Thanks Vector220 – and I’m sure I speak for everyone when I say I’m glad you’re OK and wish you “safe driving” in the future.

Saab Competes at 2007 Michelin Challenge Bibendum in Shanghai

Saab 9-3 competes at 2007 Michelin Challenge Bibendum in Shanghai

Swade reported on this earlier, but I thought I’d add some more details.

Saab has been reluctant to compete in motor sport due to the excessive cost required to do so. They do have a small motor sport department, but I believe most resources are dedicated to supporting racing teams such as Per Eklund’s and the JL Racing team in Canada.

Recently Saab competed in a road rally “race” and did quite well. The race was an event held at the 2007 Michelin Challenge Bibendum held this year in Shanghai, China. The lone Saab entry, a 2007 9-3 BioPower 60th Anniversary Edition Sport Combi, placed ninth out a field of 16 “alternative fuel” or “environmentally-friendlier” vehicles in the “Passenger Car Inter-City” class.

Continue reading

Wednesday Quick Snippets

Saab won and lost at the Michelin Bibendum Challenge.

Like most things originating from France, I’m having a hard time understading what went on there. It seems there was a road ‘rally’ in which the Saab 9-3 BioPower placed behind a Fiat Panda. I’d call this a loss.

But according to data collected during that rally, the Saab won awards for low emissions and – get this – fuel efficiency. Running on E85 and getting a fuel efficiency award?

Kudos!

——

Per Eklund will be in London in early December for the London Masters Rallycross event.

This is all part of the 2007 London Motorsport Show and the rallycross event will be held on December 8 and 9.

Click through for the full release (a bit of a PE bio piece) and one heck of a good photo.

——

A man after my own heart.

This is one of those columns where a reader tells the columnist what he’s driving now, and what he needs in his next car. The columnist thereafter proceeds to recommend various vehicles within the client’s price range.

In this case, the client is getting out of a Peugeot and definitely doesn’t want something German.

So what the recommendations?

Saab and Alfa Romeo. Beautiful.

UK Bioethanol on it’s way….

Perhaps Saab GB’s patience with BioPower will pay dividends?

Saab GB have been awaiting concessions from the UK government similar to those introduced in Sweden. As E85 becomes more accessible this has got to become more of a possibility.

The following release is from Saab GB.

——

BIOETHANOL PLANT’S A SWEET SUCCESS

# Lord Rooker, Minister for Sustainable Food and Farming and Animal Health opens British Sugar’s state of the art bioethanol production facility
# Surplus UK sugar used to make bioethanol
# At least 60% CO2 saving compared with standard unleaded petrol.

Today (22 November), Lord Rooker, Minister for Sustainable Food and Farming and Animal Health opened British Sugar’s state of the art bioethanol production facilities at Wissington, Norfolk.

The plant is the first of its kind in the UK. It produces bioethanol from locally-grown sugar beet and has an annual production capacity of 70 million litres; made from 110,000 tonnes of sugar that is surplus to the needs of the food market.

On declaring the plant open, Lord Rooker said: “These production facilities represent the marrying-up of British Agriculture and British Engineering Technology.”

Bioethanol is an environmentally-friendly, sustainable fuel source with the potential to reduce CO2 emissions by 50-70%, compared to regular unleaded petrol. In March 2008, the Government will introduce the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) which states that 5% of all fuel to be sold on forecourts must be from renewable sources by 2010. The new plant at Wissington will contribute directly to reaching this target.

Jonathan Nash, Managing Director of Saab Great Britain, said: “Saab, as the only volume car manufacturer to offer an environmentally-friendly engine choice across its entire range, welcomes this exciting new initiative. Bioethanol has an important part to play in reducing CO2 emissions from road transport and it is great to see British Sugar sourcing crops locally and maximising efficiency across their facility – it’s clear that they are at the forefront of sustainable bioethanol production in the UK.”

Speaking at the opening British Sugar Group Chief Executive, Mark Carr, said: “We are delighted to take the UK lead in this exciting new industry,” adding, “the Wissington bioethanol project clearly demonstrates our ability to identify and develop opportunities in markets where we can add value.”