Time to get away from tales of tactile but totally pointless tailoring and get into some DRIVING!
I can’t find a link but Widde points out that Tekniken’s Varld has a comparison between the 2008 Saab 9-3 Aero XWD and the Audi A4 3.2 Quattro. Mmmmm. Enticing.
Widde’s notes are as follows:
——
During the article they compare the cars against each other in the following areas:
- - Price
- Engine
- Handling
- Interior
So, kicking it off is……
Price:
The Saab is slightly cheaper, but not by much in the Swedish market.
——
Engine:
Both engines have almost same amount of power: the Aero XWD has 280hp and 400nm, the Audi A4 3.2q has 265hp and 330nm. Big torque advantage to the Saab.
The A4 3.2q engine lacks the engine growl that the Aero XWD has and the Aero XWD sound is really towards the sporty way.
Handling:
The Audi is flat through the corners, no drama what so ever. At higher speed the understeer is more noticable. At lower speeds it just silksmooth.
The SAAB is more fun to drive, especially when driven hard. Not having the eLSD is according to the magazine a plus as the lesser amount of grip makes the car more fun to drive. The chassis is fairly soft, but the compromise between sport and comfort is good.
The precision in handling doesn’t reach the Audi class.
——
Interior:
All points to Audi, SAAB still lacks the same quality feel as the Audi.
The Saab isn’t bad, it’s got perfect function and usability, but lacks the detail and quality of the Audi.
——
Summary:
The feeling and the technolgy is really there for SAAB. What they need to do now is to get the details finished better and raise the feeling of quality – and spread the XWD system to more engine alternatives.
——
SAAB 9-3 Aero XWD
+ handling, comfort, driving pleasure
- quality feeling
Audi A4 3.2 Quattro
+ steering, Engine elasticity, space
- Price




