Trollhattan Saab has changed!
The site you're viewing now is the original Trollhattan Saab weblog, though it's now an archive only and no new material is posted here. As of February 2009, all new material is posted at our new site - Saabs United.
Please join us at Saabs United and get your daily Saab fix from Saab sources all around the world.
Automotive News are reporting that there’s legislation being drafted in the US right now that will be presented next week. The legislation will offer…….
…ah heck, here’s the important bits from the report at AN, which is probably subscription-only anyway:
WASHINGTON — The government’s stake in U.S. car companies would be determined by the Treasury Department, under a House proposal to rescue the Detroit 3.
Taxpayers also would be paid back first when the automakers recover, Steve Adamske, a spokesman for Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., said in an interview today. Frank chairs the House Financial Services Committee.
The terms outlined by Adamske are among the details beginning to emerge as Congress prepares legislation to provide emergency low-interest loans to General Motors, Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC. Frank is scheduled to introduce his bill Monday.
Adamske said automakers would have to apply for the loans. Treasury would determine the government’s stake — mostly in stock warrants — based on the amount of the loan, he said.
In an interview Monday, GM CEO Rick Wagoner said it was reasonable to exchange taxpayer protection for government aid.
“Whether that’s stock warrants, restrictions on executive compensation and golden parachutes, we’ve said we’re very willing to accept those,” Wagoner told Automotive News. In announcing GM’s fifth-straight quarterly loss last week, Wagoner said GM may run out of cash to operate before mid-2009.
Frank’s legislation was drafted at the urging of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
She already has stressed that the legislation must include limits on executive pay and prohibitions on golden parachutes, plus protection for the taxpayers’ investment in the car companies.
The legislation may face opposition from Bush administration officials, who contend that the $700 billion program that would be tapped was designed to aid only financial institutions.
Adamske said today the Frank bill is “under construction.” A hearing on the measure is scheduled for Wednesday. Wagoner, Ford’s Alan Mulally, Chrysler’s Bob Nardelli and UAW President Ron Gettelfinger are expected to attend.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., is preparing a bill with provisions similar to those in the House legislation. They include government equity in the car companies as well as limits on executive compensation and bonuses, said Levin spokesman Dave Pollock. There is no specific timetable on when that bill would be introduced, he said…..
So it looks like we’re all getting a chance to breathe here. Good news. Here’s hoping they make the most of it and use some of it it to bring the new models that Saab so desparately needs.
SaabKen dropped a quote in comments the other day. It was from Bob Lutz:
“The Saab and Meriva have been delayed due to the costs involved with the final engineering programme. “To Saab the 9-5 is as important as the Astra is to Vauxhall. Saab needs the 9-5, but it’s more complex and costly to finish than the Astra.”
It’s obviously important enough, and it must be close enough now to be finished off, right?
One can dream.
–














9 responses so far ↓
1 ubermich
// Nov 14, 2008 at 8:33 am
Swade, you know that’s not how GM operates. If they get this loan they’ll squander it just like they’ve squandered all of their own money. It’s time to face the facts. The $700 Bil bailout didn’t work, the $150+ Bil AIG bailout/loan didn’t work, there’s no reason this would be any different. GM doesn’t need money, it needs to restructure from the top all the way down to the UAW.
2 Robin M
// Nov 14, 2008 at 10:45 am
I wonder if this would change Geneva? I hope so.
3 Kroum
// Nov 14, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Look at the positive here – Herr Lutz understands how important the 9-5 is.
4 aeronaut
// Nov 14, 2008 at 1:03 pm
ubermich,
in order to restructure from the top down to the uaw, gm would need to declare chapter11 to get out of all its existing agreements and then rebuild from the ground up. probably not going to happen. they will just throw money at it.
5 Markac
// Nov 14, 2008 at 1:30 pm
I hope that bailout comes with some pretty serious conditions and I hope an Administrator or Receiver controls the funds. Just handing the money over to GM is asking for trouble.
6 WooDz
// Nov 14, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Well thank you Capt. Obvious, the 9-5 should be be more costly to finalise than the Astra Mr Lutz. However a the new 9-5 has already been delayed and should have been launched back 2005. What a feeble, feeble excuse. This from a man who sucks how much out of GM each year.
Message to GM… Employ me in your restructure, I’ll gaurantee I can produce the same, if not better BS for a 10th of the cost of Lutz.
7 Markac
// Nov 14, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Mr Lutz is just making sure that Saab is kept in line and it’s products (as usual) are a day late and a dollar short. That wouldn’t always happen if Saab could release cars when it intended to.
I hope the 9-5 comes up a lot better than this Insignia.. If the 9-5 is jst a tarted up version of that car, we’re going nowhere fast.
8 Mag-X
// Nov 14, 2008 at 10:47 pm
Chances Dwindle on Bailout Plan for Automakers >> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/business/14auto.html?ex=1384405200&en=c4253b237b249f30&ei=5124&partner=digg&exprod=digg
9 SaabKen
// Nov 15, 2008 at 1:20 am
Hold your breath, as the bailouts may not happen:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/business/14auto.html?hp