Comments

• 2-don said:
  

  Wow! I wish I lived in Germany!

  -September 29th, 2008 at 9:38 pm
• Tompa said:
  

  Nice picture, and kinda bittersweet.. The last MY9-5 beside the classic 900 in red. Wish I could pan out for a bigger picture.

  -September 29th, 2008 at 10:39 pm
• Johnny said:
  

  To me, the 9-5 is starting to generate the same slightly weird feelings as I have about many of the older Saab models, at least the 99 and 900 - it is becoming a vintage classic, designed in the past, but somehow meeting most of our modern day requirements. And, rather intriguingly, exceeding some of them.

  I am not even complaining or laughing about the 9-5’s considerable age any longer. In fact, I have begun to value it as an asset. In the hysterical inferno of “all-new” model updates that surrounds us (making four-year-old predecessors look very obsolete and un-cool) the 9-5 is still there - basically the same car that was introduced more than eleven years ago, still offering everything I need and want. OK, we have seen two major and significant updates, but not much more.

  Of course the 9-5 does show its age in a less fashionable way also. The interior materials are supposedly not on par with the German opposition - but that’s fine with me. This only removes the 9-5 from the tedious nagging about “premium” status, of which I personally couldn’t care less. In a direct comparison with a new Audi, the 9-5 would fall short, but you’re not facing 1988 Nissan Micra plastics either. With a few exceptions, I find the 9-5’s interior components very solid and very well laid out. But I do like the pre-06 green instruments better!

  They say the chassis is bad. It understeers and is wallowy, and pushed hard on a race track it is not as fun to drive as many other cars. This might be true also. On the few occasions I have driven on a race track, I would not have chosen a 9-5. And of course I can tell the difference between the 9-5 and a more modern and agile car on normal roads too. But still it is a good, safe, comfortable and entertaining drive on the type of roads it was designed for, ranging from pitch black winding icy roads (where I have to spend quite some time each year) to extended motorway cruises.

  Some also note that the 9-5 lacks many of the safety features thad more modern cars have, such as active sensing systems etc. This is true, but the overall safety level of the 9-5 is very high - and it is high not just to sell more vehicles, but because it has always been that way. Safety is something so deeply rooted in the Saab (and may I say Swedish) mentality that neither Saab nor Volvo would probably understand the concept of designing and releasing truly un-safe cars even if they wanted to.

  Journalists also often complain about the gearbox, and here I agree fully. It feels like the engine mounts were made of chewing gum, and shifting gears is like moving around logs connected by rubber bands. Sometimes I think this completely ruins the impression of the fantastic engine. Was it really that difficult to come up with something better than this? Just imagine if the 9-5 had the solid feel of the 9-3 gear shift!

  So the current 9-5 is a car I have come to genuinely like, regardless of where it would end up in a magazine comparison test. But of course I will salute the new generation 9-5 when it appears. It will probably be a far better and more desirable car both for us Saab nuts as well as for non-Saabers. In the meantime, I guess those of us who wish we’d bought a new black 99 Turbo in the seventies and preserved it in pristine condition should go take a serious look at the MY09 9-5…

  Cheers,
  Johnny

  -September 30th, 2008 at 5:48 am
• Bruce said:
  

  Thanks Johnny. Exactly why we got our ‘07 2.3T. As much as I enjoy gear shifting, I also advise getting the automatic in this car. Tap the S button on the lever when you don’t have passengers to coddle, and enjoy the change in attitude–even more fun than the shift paddles.
  B

  -September 30th, 2008 at 12:27 pm

Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks