<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even MORE from the rumourmill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html</link>
	<description>Saab 9-1, 9-3, 9-4x, 9-5, 9-7x News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaabKen</title>
		<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html#comment-6213</link>
		<dc:creator>SaabKen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s18881.gridserver.com/archives/1397#comment-6213</guid>
		<description>If the 9-4X is indeed a close cousin of the 9-3 (or 9-3X concept), the nomenclature would appear similar to Ovlov&#039;s S40/V50,  S60/V70 and S80/V90 in that the wagon/CUV model is numbered one digit higher than the sedan equivalent.

Which would more or less match current understand that the 9-7X would be phased out with the introduction of the 9-6X (lambda based) which will be the 9-5&#039;s CUV stable mate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the 9-4X is indeed a close cousin of the 9-3 (or 9-3X concept), the nomenclature would appear similar to Ovlov&#8217;s S40/V50,  S60/V70 and S80/V90 in that the wagon/CUV model is numbered one digit higher than the sedan equivalent.</p>
<p>Which would more or less match current understand that the 9-7X would be phased out with the introduction of the 9-6X (lambda based) which will be the 9-5&#8242;s CUV stable mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saabill</title>
		<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html#comment-6212</link>
		<dc:creator>Saabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s18881.gridserver.com/archives/1397#comment-6212</guid>
		<description>....so, the new model will be revealed at the June gathering. Now SW, where will we be June 2007? Oh, that&#039;s right - Trollhatten!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.so, the new model will be revealed at the June gathering. Now SW, where will we be June 2007? Oh, that&#8217;s right &#8211; Trollhatten!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swade</title>
		<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>Swade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s18881.gridserver.com/archives/1397#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>Mag-X

The more I think about it, the more I agree with you.  When you think about the all the weather testing, parts design etc that they&#039;d have to do for the 9-5, there just doesn&#039;t seem to be a way they could bring it to market that quickly.

I&#039;ve also heard some other mumblings that the 9-4x could be a lot more 9-3-based than we thought.  So much so that they&#039;ve got me thinking of the 9-3x concept, which I&#039;m going to have to go back and have a look at.

I&#039;m sure some more facts will be forthcoming in the next few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mag-X</p>
<p>The more I think about it, the more I agree with you.  When you think about the all the weather testing, parts design etc that they&#8217;d have to do for the 9-5, there just doesn&#8217;t seem to be a way they could bring it to market that quickly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also heard some other mumblings that the 9-4x could be a lot more 9-3-based than we thought.  So much so that they&#8217;ve got me thinking of the 9-3x concept, which I&#8217;m going to have to go back and have a look at.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure some more facts will be forthcoming in the next few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mag-X</title>
		<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html#comment-6210</link>
		<dc:creator>Mag-X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s18881.gridserver.com/archives/1397#comment-6210</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m betting it&#039;ll be the 9-4X. It&#039;s probably much closer to completion than the new 9-5. If the rumors are true though, I cannot imagine that the new 9-5 will be too far behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m betting it&#8217;ll be the 9-4X. It&#8217;s probably much closer to completion than the new 9-5. If the rumors are true though, I cannot imagine that the new 9-5 will be too far behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaabKen</title>
		<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html#comment-6209</link>
		<dc:creator>SaabKen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s18881.gridserver.com/archives/1397#comment-6209</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, E&amp;G, the 9-4X is our goose that&#039;ll lay the golden egg ..... more $$$ for Saab is always good !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, E&#038;G, the 9-4X is our goose that&#8217;ll lay the golden egg &#8230;.. more $$$ for Saab is always good !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eggsngrits</title>
		<link>http://www.trollhattansaab.net/archives/2006/10/even_more_from.html#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>eggsngrits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s18881.gridserver.com/archives/1397#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about no stinkin&#039; 9-4x... 

Bring on the new 9-5!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about no stinkin&#8217; 9-4x&#8230; </p>
<p>Bring on the new 9-5!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

